Chakastapaysin and four headmen signed Treaty 6 in August 1876 at Fort Carlton. Their band resided in an area around Fort à la Corne in the late 1880s, but the Department of Indian Affairs alleged that all of the Chakastapaysin Band members had moved off their reserve by 1898 and that their names had been added to the pay lists of other bands. The government claimed that they had ceased to exist as a band from that point, and their reserve was sold. Proceeds were credited to the bands to which Chakastapaysin Band members were transferred.

​

In December 1998, members of the James Smith Cree Nation, descended from Chakastapaysin Band members, launched a claim against the federal government, arguing that the Chakastapaysin Reserve had been unlawfully surrendered and sold. In May 1999, the Indian Claims Commission was asked to conduct an inquiry into the rejection of this claim; Canada has not raised a challenge to the inquiry, although it remains unsettled.

​

As of the current date, the Chakastapaysin Band, represented by members of the James Smith Cree Nation, has been actively engaged in negotiations with the Canadian government to seek justice for the historical grievances and to pursue the re-establishment of their community on IR #98. The claim launched in December 1998 by the James Smith Cree Nation against the federal government was a significant step in seeking recognition and restitution for the unlawful surrender and sale of the Chakastapaysin Reserve.

​

Since then, Chakastapaysin has been working diligently in the negotiation process with the Canadian government to address the outstanding issues and reach a settlement that would pave the way for their re-establishment as a distinct and recognized band. The hope is that through these settlements, the Chakastapaysin Band will regain their rightful place, and their traditional lands can be secured for their use and benefit.

​

The recognition of the Chakastapaysin Band at various levels by different First Nations organizations and government departments indicates a growing acknowledgment of their historical presence and their right to self-determination. This recognition is vital for building a strong case for the re-establishment of their community on IR #98.

​

Rebuilding their home community is not only about securing the land but also about reclaiming their cultural heritage and revitalizing their traditional way of life. With the settlement process underway, the Chakastapaysin Band has the opportunity to regain control over their destiny, fostering a sense of belonging and pride among their members.

​

However, it is essential to note that the negotiation process can be complex and may take time. The parties involved must navigate through various legal, historical, and socio-political intricacies to reach a fair and just resolution. Throughout this process, the Chakastapaysin Band and their representatives will likely face challenges, but their determination and perseverance in pursuing their rights will be crucial in achieving their goals.

​

Ultimately, the outcome of these settlements will determine the future of the Chakastapaysin Band and their ability to re-establish their community on IR #98. With continued dedication and support from various stakeholders, there is hope that the Chakastapaysin Band will soon see their dream of rebuilding their home community become a reality.